Which way of representing folders do you prefer?

September 20, 2010 at 11:57 am 9 comments

Our design team is busy working on developing a new foldering system. Users will be able to store their exams, etc., in folders. There will be various levels of permissions around folders. For example, users at a district level might create a “district” folder and use it as a central repository for exams used district-wide. They might opt to make this folder “read only.” In other words, classroom teachers across the district could open/view exams posted in this folder, but they could not edit them in any way.The extent to which folders are permissioned would be configured by each district to best suit your needs. Our design team is also exploring how best to allow sharing of such content across districts (for places like Michigan where users are collaborating across many districts.)

Users will also have a personal folder they can use to store exams that they have created. Users will have the ability to copy/share exams they have made with other users – placing copies in other folders that they have permission to do so.

In general, users would have the ability to create and name new folders at their level of the organization. For example, classroom teachers could generally create folders within their building, but not across the district. There will be options to override these defaults.

Our design team is exploring a couple of different ways of visually represent these folders on the screen, and we’d like your feedback, comments and insights. For simplicity, I’ll call the first design “Folder Design 1,” the second design “Folder Design 2,” and the third design (you guessed it) “Folder Design 3.”

For now, ignore the color schemes and fonts used in these examples. Those will follow the final “look and feel” of the application itself. Focus for now on the way the folders are displayed/organized on the screen.

(Hint: If you click on the visuals below, you can see a larger view of them. Use your browser’s Back button to bring you back to this post.)

Folder Design 1

The example (above) keeps the folders (and exams located within them) in a more in-line structure. Users would click the toggle to reveal the exams located in the folder.

If the list of exams was long, then “pagination” controls would appear at the bottom of the screen, allowing users to navigate from Page 1 to Page 2, etc.

Folder Design 2

In this (above) design, folders are placed at the left. When a user clicks a folder, the list of exams within it would appear on the right side of the screen.

Folder Design 3

In this example, the folders act more like a “floating panel,” which users can hide or view. This example shows the panel hidden from view. Below, an example with the user making the folder panel visible:

Post your comments and let us know what you think of them, and more important, which you think Edusoft and DataDirector users would prefer.

Advertisement

Entry filed under: Simplicity, Smart Applications, User Interface. Tags: , , , .

“This is what we’ve been waiting for for 15 years” Tell us your thoughts on white papers…

9 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Mike Oswalt  |  September 20, 2010 at 11:45 pm

    Thanks for exploring ways to make viewing exams much easier! I personally prefer #2 – this allows for quick navigation on the left while seeing the list inside the chosen folder on the right. Very much like Google Docs and they way items are stored in folders there. Anytime we can keep functionality similar to other systems, that is a good thing for transfer of knowledge in how to navigate a system!

    Reply
  • 2. Mike Oswalt  |  September 20, 2010 at 11:46 pm

    Forgot to mention – this hierachy is suggested:

    my exams
    team exams
    building exams
    district exams
    consortium exams

    Reply
  • 3. Mike Mitchell  |  September 21, 2010 at 9:27 am

    Thanks Mike. I appreciate the comments. I think I know the answer to this, but I will ask just to make sure… in the folder hierarchy you suggest, the ability to permission would apply to all levels, right? In other words, if Michigan had a “consortium folder,” you might want to permission who can read exams in that folder vs. those who can actually add exams to that folder…. right?

    Reply
  • 4. David Weidner  |  September 22, 2010 at 12:55 pm

    The layout of Folder Concept 2 appeals to me. It has a logical appearance with the Exams to the Right. Drag and drop would appear easier as well.

    Reply
  • 5. Mike White  |  September 25, 2010 at 10:36 am

    I like the number 2 folders–easiest to understand and follow

    Reply
  • 6. Scott Traub  |  September 30, 2010 at 4:30 pm

    I’m with Mike, I like #2. It is straight forward, easy to discern which folder you are looking at.

    Reply
  • 7. Jeff Piontek  |  September 30, 2010 at 5:04 pm

    The folder system that I would prefer would be #2. It looks like my (and others) email systems and similar to googledocs or outlook. Mike O’s ideas about hierarchy are important as well as permissions for the folders so it delineates the importance.

    Reply
  • 8. liz frischhertz  |  September 30, 2010 at 11:31 pm

    Two is OK – we use a similar folder system. Format of our district tests is critical with 82+ coordinators pulling answer documents for their teachers. Also would like the ability to color code – all pre-test in green for example or red name means answer sheet should not be printed yet.

    Reply
  • 9. Mike Mitchell  |  October 1, 2010 at 7:37 am

    Liz – I like the idea of the color-coding. We might not be able to work that idea into what our development team is working on now, but that is definitely a great idea for us to explore for a future enhancement. I will definitely have a chat with our developers about what it would take to code such an option. Great suggestion!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Mike Mitchell’s Tweets:

Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.